Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, lean skill body: concrete executable commands for every flow, verification steps embedded in each sequence, and clean sectioned organization with one-level references. The main improvements are removing the redundant intro paragraph, adding brief error-recovery guidance for failed verifications, and moving Further Reading targets into the skill bundle so they ship with it.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph, which duplicates the frontmatter description, and consolidate Key Points bullets that restate section content.
Add one or two error-recovery lines (e.g., what to check when './afs status' shows the mount is inactive or 'afs cp restore' fails) to close the feedback-loop gap.
Bundle the three Further Reading docs under references/ within the skill directory so the paths resolve wherever the skill is installed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-first with no concept explanations, but the opening paragraph ("AFS is a workspace system for agents, backed by Redis. Use it when you want a durable workspace that still feels like normal files and directories...") restates the frontmatter description, and a few Key Points ("Redis is the source of truth", "Create checkpoints explicitly") overlap other sections. Anchor 4 (efficient, minor trimming possible) fits; anchor 5 would require every token to earn its place with zero redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section gives copy-paste-ready commands covering the common cases: "./afs ws create my-project", "./afs ws mount my-project ~/my-project", "./afs fs grep --workspace my-project 'TODO auth'", "./afs cp create/restore", "./afs ws fork", including flag variants ("--path /src -E 'timeout|retry'"). This matches the anchor-5 example of fully executable commands covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each flow has a clear sequence with explicit verification commands ("./afs ws list # verify the workspace exists", "./afs status", "./afs cp list # confirm the restore completed"), so the destructive restore operation is validated and the cap-at-3 rule does not apply. However there are no error-recovery feedback loops (no guidance on what to do when a verify step fails), which keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-labeled, one-level-deep pointers ("docs/guides/agent-filesystem.md — agent-facing usage guide", "docs/reference/cli.md — full CLI command reference", "docs/reference/mcp.md — MCP tool reference"), matching the anchor-5 pattern of well-signaled references. It falls to 4 because the referenced paths sit outside the skill bundle (no references/ directory exists, so the paths cannot be verified as real bundle files) — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |