Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable workflow doc: concrete paths and formats, clearly sequenced multi-step processes with read-before-write checkpoints, and clean single-file organization with no token waste. No substantive weaknesses to address.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean imperatives and short lists throughout; the only explanatory prose (the opening rationale for the layout) conveys non-obvious context Claude would not already know, so every token earns its place rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives exact paths (e.g. '/inflight/<handle>/<slug>.md', '/done/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md') and concrete format blocks for questions and revised-section markers; as an instruction-only skill, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Three numbered workflows (start, mark-done, add-question) are clearly sequenced, with pre-write checkpoints — re-reading shared files and scanning /inflight/ for conflicts before starting — acting as validation; the single low-risk destructive step (deleting the inflight file after copying to /done/) is guarded by these read-heavy reflexes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear sections and no nested/deep references; no bundle files exist and nothing in the content needs splitting, so well-organized sections suffice for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |