Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, project-specific skill body with executable commands, hard ALWAYS/NEVER rules, and exemplary progressive disclosure to real reference files. It falls short of top marks only in small ways: some general Playwright knowledge restated, no inline test example, and the end-to-end workflow spread across sections rather than sequenced explicitly.
Suggestions
Collapse the "Selector Priority" section into a single line under Critical Rules (e.g., "Selector priority: getByRole > getByLabel > getByText > getByTestId") to avoid restating general Playwright knowledge.
Add one minimal executable spec example in the body (import from tests/shared/e2e.ts, one test with a getByRole selector) so the primary task — writing a test — is demonstrated before deferring to test-patterns.md.
Present the core loop as a short numbered sequence — build, run variant, inspect .rstest/ artifacts on failure, fix, re-run — so error recovery is explicit in the body rather than only reachable via the failure-analysis reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and almost entirely project-specific, but the "Selector Priority" section (getByRole > getByLabel > getByText > getByTestId) restates general Playwright best practice Claude already knows — a minor instance that could be trimmed to one line. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are fully copy-paste runnable ("bun run build", "bun run e2e-test:variant console ...") with exact file locations and import paths, but the body lacks even a minimal example spec snippet, deferring all test code to the references — a minor gap for the core task of writing tests. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Build-first ordering, the Output checklist (confirm build, verify tests pass, note test IDs, cleanup), and afterEach cleanup give a clear sequence with most checkpoints, but the build → run → analyze-failure → fix → re-run loop is never laid out as one coherent sequence in the body and error recovery is delegated to the failure-analysis reference. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep References section ("[Container Setup](references/container-setup.md) — Testcontainer lifecycle..."); all three referenced files exist, are appropriately sized, and contain the promised content without nesting skill references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |