Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured, actionable workflow with explicit validation and error-recovery guidance for a batch git operation. The only minor gap is that the multi-package version update in step 3 is described as instruction rather than a concrete command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: a single functional rationale sentence plus tight, command-driven steps with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most steps give copy-paste-ready commands (gh, git, rg, bun install), but step 3's actual package.json edits are described instructionally ("Update every match to the new version") rather than as an executable command, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint in step 5 (git status, investigate before proceeding) and error-recovery guidance in Notes (bun install failure → close PR; major version → check breaking changes), satisfying the validation requirement for batch operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This single-purpose, sub-50-line skill is well-organized with clear ## Steps and ## Notes headers and needs no external bundle files, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |