CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

formatting

Run Remotion formatting and style checks until they pass. Use when the user asks to fix formatting or run the formatting command.

66

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/formatting/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary minimal skill body: one executable command with a precise pass condition plus a targeted project-specific exception, with no wasted tokens. Nothing is missing for a task of this scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Two lean lines with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the 'lambda-go' note is non-obvious project-specific knowledge, so every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command ('bun run stylecheck') with an explicit success criterion (exit code 0) and a concrete, actionable exception for 'lambda-go' errors.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill where the single action is unambiguous; 'until the exit code is 0' supplies an explicit validation criterion and loop condition, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with no need for external references or sections; per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, such minimal, self-contained content can score 5 for progressive disclosure.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, correctly structured description with both a what and an explicit when-clause in third person. It is held back by a single listed action, generic trigger phrasing that overlaps other formatting skills, and missing synonyms users might naturally say.

Suggestions

Add one or two more concrete actions (e.g., auto-fix lint/prettier violations in Remotion components) to raise specificity and distinctiveness.

Broaden trigger phrasing with natural synonyms such as 'lint errors', 'prettier failures', or 'style issues' so users' varied requests match.

Make the when-clause more concrete, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to fix formatting, resolve lint or prettier errors, or run the stylecheck command.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Remotion formatting and style checks') and one concrete action ('Run ... until they pass'), but lists no further actions, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the several-action anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both what ('Run Remotion formatting and style checks until they pass') and when ('Use when the user asks to fix formatting or run the formatting command') are explicitly present; the when-clause could be more specific (e.g., failing checks or lint output), matching the anchor at 4 rather than the fully concrete trigger coverage of 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ('formatting', 'style checks', 'fix formatting'), but common variations users would naturally say — 'lint', 'prettier', 'style issues', 'format the code' — are missing, matching the 'missing common variations or synonyms' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Remotion' narrows the scope, but the trigger phrase 'fix formatting' is generic and would overlap with any general formatting/linting skill; this fits 'somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills' better than the minor-overlap anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
remotion-dev/remotion
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.