Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured workflow: a diagnostic checklist followed by clearly sequenced remediation steps per condition, with validation steps and a confirmation checkpoint. The only improvements are specifying the exact gh commands and an explicit post-push CI verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 30 lines with zero padding; every line is a useful instruction and no concepts Claude already knows are re-explained. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete ordered steps with explicit commands (`git status`, the `gh` CLI), but the exact gh invocations (e.g. `gh pr checks`, `gh pr view`) are not given, leaving minor gaps from copy-paste readiness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear diagnostic sequence leading into two condition branches with validation steps (run formatting/tests/builds, run relevant local checks) and a user-confirmation checkpoint before pushing; the only gap is an explicit re-verify-CI-green loop after pushing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the content is cleanly organized into a trigger list, a diagnostic checklist, and two per-condition step lists. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |