Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary short-form skill body: a precise executable command with environment guidance, an explicit verification step with a concrete checklist, and lean notes covering genuinely non-obvious generator behaviors. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit fix-and-regenerate loop after the review step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 14-line body is lean and every token earns its place: source-of-truth path with a "do not edit the PDFs directly" guard, the exact command, the Python environment note, the commit scope, and two non-obvious generator behaviors. No padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: the exact command "python3 .agents/skills/update-legal-pdfs/scripts/generate.py" run from the repository root, how to obtain a reportlab environment, a concrete per-file review checklist (title, notices, headings, tables, links, contact details), and the redirect mapping file. Nothing is left as vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (generate, review, commit) with an explicit validation step: "Confirm each PDF retains the source title, notices, headings, tables, links, and final contact details. Render the pages to check wrapping and page breaks." It falls short of 5 only because there is no explicit error-recovery loop saying what to do when the review fails (fix the MDX source and re-run the generator). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references; the body is well organized as a numbered workflow plus notes, and the one bundle file it relies on (scripts/generate.py) exists and is invoked by an exact path rather than duplicated inline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |