Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, highly actionable review checklist that assumes expertise and wastes no tokens, with clean section structure and no external references needed. Its only gap is the absence of an explicit review workflow/ordering.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, naming linters, paths, and libraries without explaining what they are or padding with concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact linters to skip, exact paths (pkg/cli/, pkg/errors.CodedError), exact libraries (testify/require, testify/assert), and specific anti-patterns like fmt.Errorf without %w. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose review skill it is well-organized by category with a clear skip-vs-look-for split, but it lacks an explicit review sequence or prioritization checkpoints, leaving it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed; well-organized into clearly headed sections, which qualifies for a top score per the simple-skill guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |