Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sequenced instruction skill with a clear build process and self-check list. It loses points for actionability (no concrete examples or templates inline) and for a broken progressive-disclosure reference to a missing reference.md file.
Suggestions
Add one concrete inline example (e.g., a sample before/after prompt or a filled-in template) under the Build Sequence to lift actionability from abstract steps to copy-paste-ready guidance.
Create the referenced reference.md (or remove the link) — the body promises templates, anti-patterns, and refinement loops at [reference.md](reference.md) but no such file exists in the bundle.
Optionally fold a compact template snippet directly into the body so the skill is self-contained even if the external reference is unavailable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~25 lines) with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Purpose, Build Sequence, Quality Checks, Reference) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The Build Sequence gives concrete ordered steps ("Define objective, audience, and success criteria", "Capture hard constraints (format, tools, safety, style)"), but guidance stays abstract with no inline example, template, or sample prompt to make it copy-paste ready; not score 3 because concrete examples are absent, not score 1 because the steps are specific and directive rather than vague. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Build Sequence is a clearly numbered 5-step process with an explicit feedback loop (step 5: "Iterate using concrete examples and observed errors") and a validation checklist (Prompt Quality Checks), matching the anchor requiring a clear sequence plus checkpoints; not capped at 2 because this is a design process, not a destructive/batch operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the body points one level deep to [reference.md](reference.md) for templates, anti-patterns, and refinement loops, but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle (no references/ directory or reference.md present), so the disclosed content is unreachable; not score 1 because the body itself is well structured rather than monolithic or nested, not score 3 because the single external reference is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |