Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, actionable pre-modification playbook with concrete MCP calls, explicit warning thresholds as checkpoints, and clean section organization; its only real weakness is minor editorial padding and the lack of a post-edit verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and tool-specific (return fields, thresholds), with only minor editorializing such as 'the strongest single signal that the next edit breaks something; lead with it' that could be trimmed — efficient but not perfectly so. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready MCP calls are given for every situation — `get_risk(targets=[...])`, batch form, `get_context`, `get_health` — with concrete thresholds (90th percentile, >10 dependents, bus factor 1) and named return fields to act on. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow across sections with explicit decision checkpoints (the 'When to warn the user' thresholds gate whether to proceed) and an error-handling fallback; the only gap is the absence of a post-modification verification/feedback loop, which keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Before editing, multiple files, when to warn, before refactoring, error handling), satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |