Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, decision-focused skill body that delivers concrete API names, a worked mapping table, and clear sequencing with a design-checkpoint. It appropriately defers mechanism details to sibling skills; the main gaps are the absence of a literal code example and the lack of any local bundle files to validate internal progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add one short, complete copy-paste code snippet (e.g., reader.stream() + a lens producing a chunk) to lift actionability toward fully executable guidance.
Introduce an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint for the mapping-table step (e.g., 'review the table against the source schema; if a row cannot name an archetype/component, re-resolve before coding') to strengthen the feedback loop.
Consider moving the 7-item gotchas list into a short local references file (e.g., references/gotchas.md) so the main body stays a lean overview and progressive disclosure has an internal one-level-deep target.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and decision-focused ('This skill is just the decisions') and avoids re-explaining Rerun or robotics basics, but contains a few framing sentences ('Modeling decides _what_… this decides _how_') and a long gotchas list that occasionally re-states concepts; mostly efficient with minor trims possible, so not a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — named readers (McapReader, UrdfTree, ParquetReader, RrdReader, RrdReader, log_file_from_path), exact archetypes (Scalars, Points3D, Pinhole, VideoStream), a worked mapping table with real example rows, and exact indexing ('[0]/[0][0] (0-based DataFrame, 1-based SQL)'); falls short of 5 only because there is no literal copy-paste code block, though the named APIs are specific enough to act on. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences a clear design workflow (pick mechanism → model → decisions → mapping table → patterns → gotchas) with an explicit checkpoint ('Before writing conversion code, fill in the mapping table below … a human can review it in seconds'); not a 5 because the validation is a reviewable design artifact rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, and the skill is decision/design-oriented rather than batch-destructive so the destructive-op cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body acts as an overview and repeatedly routes out one level deep to clearly signaled sibling skills ('For mechanism details see rerun-chunk-processing,' 'See rerun-catalog-queries,' the importer skills), keeping this file appropriately high-level; not a 5 because no local bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and all references point to external sibling skills rather than an internal bundle structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |