Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction-only skill: an exact output template with precise ratio and fix-direction rules makes the expected deliverable unambiguous, and the short single-task body justifies having no external files. The only minor gaps are an undefined severity scale and the absence of a worked example, which keep actionability just below full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line earns its place: one sentence of persona framing ("친절한 멘토가 아니라 회의적인 투자자처럼 본다"), a three-item input list, a compact output template, and three rules — no concept explanations, no padding, and it fully assumes Claude's competence at critiquing deliverables. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The output template is fully concrete — exact sections, table columns "# | 우려 | 왜 중요한가 | 심각도 | 수정 방향", and priority tiers "오늘 고칠 것 / 1주 안에 검증할 것 / 나중에 해도 되는 것" — and the rules are specific ("칭찬 30%, 공격 70%", "모든 비판에는 수정 방향을 붙인다"). It falls short of 5 only because the "심각도" scale is undefined and no worked example of a criticism-and-fix pair is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill whose single action is unambiguous: read the listed inputs (산출물 전체, 특히 걱정되는 부분, 피치 대상), apply the three rules, and emit the memo in the given format. The simple-skill exception applies, and since the skill is non-destructive and non-batch, no validation checkpoint is required. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well under 50 lines and needs no external references (none exist in the bundle, and none are required for this task); the four clearly labeled sections (역할, 입력, 출력 형식, 규칙) satisfy the simple-skill criterion for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |