Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable brainstorming workflow with clear sequencing and explicit validation checkpoints. Its only weakness is mild redundancy between the process description and the Key Principles restatement, which slightly trims conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean bullet-point prose that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining known concepts, with only mild redundancy where the 'Key Principles' section restates points already made in 'The Process' (one question at a time, 2-3 approaches, incremental validation). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific numbers ('200-300 words', '2-3 approaches', 'one question per message'), a concrete output path ('docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md'), and named companion skills to invoke, with only minor gaps in the implementation handoff. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced multi-step process (Understanding → Exploring approaches → Presenting the design → After the design) with explicit validation checkpoints ('ask after each section whether it looks right so far') and feedback loops ('be ready to go back and clarify'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~50 line), single-purpose skill with no external bundle files needed; it is well-organized with clear section headers and appropriately signals companion skills, meeting the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |