Conciseness

The body is dominated by copy-paste commands with terse guidance and assumes competence (no explanation of NuGet or package management basics). Minor trimmable parts — the dense containment-policy paragraph ("Reversible visible escape spellings may still disambiguate literal package content...") and repeated command blocks differing only in --row — keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

Actionability

Every workflow step is backed by a complete, executable command (e.g. "dnx dotnet-inspect -y -- project path/to/project -S Skills --count", "--print --row 2 --raw", "package Markout@0.35.2", "--output skills/markout-output-formats/SKILL.md") covering the common cases. Copy-paste ready throughout; matches anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

Three clearly sequenced workflows (default discovery, exact-package inspection, user-requested persistence) with checkpoints such as "If the count is nonzero", frontmatter-before-full-document inspection, "Omit -o/--output to review the document on stdout before writing it", and metadata refusal on noncompliant skills. Not 5 because there is no explicit fix-and-retry loop after a refusal — "Do not recover a refused skill by sanitizing or renaming it" says what not to do but not what to do next.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and the body is self-contained with three well-labeled sections and a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer ("Load dotnet-inspect skill private-feeds" for a conditional path). It exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case, and material like the containment-policy details could arguably live in a reference file, so anchor 4 fits better than 5.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — "Discover version-matched agent skills in restored NuGet dependencies or an exact package", "select relevant guidance and load it without changing the repository", "persist skills only when explicitly requested" — with clear conditions. Falls short of 5 because it omits the inventory/inspection steps and never names the tool (dotnet-inspect); it is clearly above 3, which expects only 1-2 concrete actions.

Completeness

The "what" is clear and detailed (discover, select, load, persist), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance — "persist skills only when explicitly requested" is a behavior condition, not a usage trigger. Per the rubric guidelines, a missing trigger clause caps completeness at 3; it is not 2 because the "what" is explicit.

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like "NuGet", "package", "dependencies", and "skills" are present, but natural phrases users would say — ".NET", "dotnet", "restore", the tool name "dotnet-inspect" — are missing. Matches anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations) rather than 4, where only a few natural terms would be absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"version-matched agent skills in restored NuGet dependencies" carves a clear niche with distinct triggers that few other skills would match. Matches anchor 5 (clear niche, minimal conflict risk); anchor 4 would imply notable overlap with closely related skills, which is not the case here.