Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured skill body: lean overview, concrete verification commands, a workflow with genuine fix-and-retry feedback loops, and exemplary reference splitting into existing one-level-deep files. The residual weaknesses are minor — a couple of fluffy closing lines and zero inline code examples in the body itself.
Suggestions
Trim the closing line 'Focus on production-ready, tested, maintainable Go code following modern best practices' and tighten generic workflow steps like 'Read Task Description' / 'Plan Implementation' to reclaim tokens without losing clarity.
Include one small inline code snippet (e.g., a minimal handler or table-driven test skeleton) in the body so common cases are actionable even before the references are opened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~77-line body is lean and assumes competence — the structure tree, house-convention bullets, and workflow all earn their tokens. It sits at 4 rather than 5 because of small trimmable bits: the closing 'Focus on production-ready, tested, maintainable Go code following modern best practices' is fluffy, and generic step intros like 'Read Task Description: Understand requirements and acceptance criteria' pad slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: a concrete project-structure tree, exact verification commands ('go test -race ./...', 'go fmt', 'golangci-lint'), and usage invocations. It is not 5 because the body itself contains no executable code example (patterns are deferred to references), leaving minor gaps if the references aren't read. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step workflow has explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: 'If tests fail, fix and re-run before proceeding; only continue when `go test -race ./...` passes' and the same fix-and-re-run loop for lint/formatting. This matches the top anchor's validate → fix → retry pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with three well-signaled, one-level-deep references (references/patterns.md, references/database.md, references/quality.md — all verified to exist, none nesting further), each labeled with its contents and gated by 'read the one relevant to your task.' Content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |