Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-organized reference that gives a connector developer nearly everything needed: the full interface contract, response shapes, auth/assignment/rate-limit patterns, and pointers to four real connectors. Its main gaps are the absence of a sequenced build-and-validate workflow and reliance on ellipsis placeholders instead of one complete example implementation.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered development workflow (scaffold src/connectors/<crm-name>/index.js → implement interfaces → verify against the response formats → test against a reference connector), with an explicit validation step so connector bugs are caught early — this addresses the workflow_clarity gap.
Replace the "// ... implement all interfaces" / "// ... export all other functions" placeholders with one complete, minimal example implementation (e.g., a working findContact against a real CRM API) to make the guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Move the full interface signature table and response-format objects into a references/ file (e.g., references/interfaces.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is almost entirely project-specific detail — the interface table, response format shapes, rate-limit header keys, the user-assignment pattern — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no OAuth tutorial, no library primer). The only trimming candidates are trivial (the parsePhoneNumber require is shown in both the file-structure block and the Phone Number Handling section), so it sits at the lean anchor rather than 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is executable: copy-paste response objects for contact matches and call logs, a working user-assignment snippet, rate-limit tracking fields, phone parsing, and an error-return shape. It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because the file-structure example truncates with "// ... implement all interfaces" and "// ... export all other functions", and no complete reference implementation of even one interface is shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized as a requirements catalog (interfaces, formats, patterns) rather than a sequenced development workflow: there is no scaffold → implement → verify order and no validation or testing checkpoints for confirming a connector behaves correctly. Sequence is only implicit in the interface table, matching the 'listed but checkpoints missing' anchor rather than the explicit-validation anchor at 4 or the incoherent anchor at 2. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files present, the single-file structure is well-sectioned and easy to navigate, and the Reference Connectors section points to real repo files (pipedrive, bullhorn, insightly, redtail) as worked examples. It is not a 5 because ~200 lines of interface signatures and response-format detail are inlined in SKILL.md where a references/ file (e.g., an interface spec) would keep the overview leaner — a minor organization gap rather than the 'content that should be separate is inline' extent of the 3 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |