data-engineering-data-pipeline

You are a data pipeline architecture expert specializing in scalable, reliable, and cost-effective data pipelines for batch and streaming data processing.

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/data-engineering-data-pipeline/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-organized, technically concrete, and largely token-efficient, with named tools and specific thresholds throughout. Its main weaknesses are a non-executable illustrative code example and the absence of explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the batch workflow, which caps workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Replace the fictional imports in the example with real, runnable library calls (e.g. pandas/SQLAlchemy + deltalake) or clearly label it as illustrative pseudocode.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the Instructions sequence (e.g. 'Run data-quality suite; on failure, route to DLQ and retry') to establish a validate->fix->retry feedback loop.

Trim the duplicated opening persona line that repeats the frontmatter description verbatim.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dense with concrete technical points and largely assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what Kafka/dbt/Parquet are), with only minor redundancy such as the opening line duplicating the description; fits 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than fully lean.	4 / 5
Actionability	Most guidance is concrete and specific (named tools, patterns, thresholds like '512MB-1GB for Parquet', '>1GB' partitions), but the flagship code example imports non-existent modules (batch_ingestion, storage.delta_lake_manager) and is illustrative pseudocode rather than executable, pulling it below 4 toward the 'pseudocode' anchor.	3.5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A numbered Instructions sequence (Architecture Design through Monitoring) gives a rough flow, but for a batch/data-pipeline skill there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (validate -> fix -> retry); per the batch-operations cap, workflow clarity cannot exceed 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the skill is a single self-contained document with clear, well-organized section headers and no nested references, fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'; not 5 because it exceeds 50 lines with some content (detailed per-tool sections, the example) inlined that could be split out.	4 / 5
	Total	14.5 / 20 Passed

Description

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly scopes a domain niche and uses third-person voice, but it reads as a persona statement rather than an action/trigger specification. It lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause and concrete named actions, capping completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Replace the persona phrasing with concrete actions, e.g. 'Designs ETL/ELT, Lambda, Kappa, and Lakehouse pipelines for batch and streaming data processing.'

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when the user needs to design, build, or review data pipelines, ETL/ELT workflows, or streaming ingestion.'

Include natural synonyms and file-format terms (ETL, ELT, ingestion, orchestration) to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ('data pipeline architecture') and references batch and streaming processing, but actions are abstract and persona-based ('expert specializing in') rather than concrete named actions, placing it between the 'minimal/generic actions' (2) and '1-2 concrete actions' (3) anchors.	2.5 / 5
Completeness	It provides a clear 'what' (scalable, reliable, cost-effective batch and streaming pipelines) but no explicit 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger clause, so per the missing-trigger-cap guideline it cannot exceed 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It includes relevant natural terms ('data pipelines', 'batch', 'streaming', 'data processing') but omits common variations and synonyms (ETL, ELT, ingestion, data engineering), matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor rather than full coverage.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'data pipeline architecture' niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general data-engineering skills, fitting the 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' anchor; not a 5 because no explicit distinct trigger phrases are given.	4 / 5
	Total	12.5 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/data-engineering-data-pipeline/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.