Content
42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and reasonably concise but provides only generic, non-executable guidance with no SQL examples or feedback loops, and it references a playbook file that is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, executable SQL migration example (e.g., an expand-contract column rename with validation queries) instead of deferring all detail to the missing playbook.
Provide the referenced resources/implementation-playbook.md or remove the broken reference so navigation actually resolves.
Insert explicit validation checkpoints with a feedback loop (run pre-checks -> apply -> verify -> rollback if failed) into the migration workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with organized sections, but the 'You are a SQL database migration expert...' intro and the repeated 'production-ready' phrasing restate the description and could be tightened, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Instructions are high-level hints ('Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes') with no SQL, code, or concrete commands, and the detailed examples are deferred to a referenced file that does not exist, fitting anchor 2. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Output Format gives a rough sequence including validation and rollback items, but there is no validate->fix->retry feedback loop; for destructive/batch database operations this caps workflow_clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable and references are clearly signaled, but the single referenced file (resources/implementation-playbook.md) is not present, so the one-level-deep reference does not resolve, landing at anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |