CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

defi-protocol-templates

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for staking, AMMs, governance, and lending systems. Use when building decentralized finance applications or smart contract protocols.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content provides strong, copy-paste-ready Solidity templates but is weighed down by inlined full contracts that duplicate nonexistent asset files, generic Instruction filler, and no real validation workflow for high-stakes contract deployment. Progressive disclosure suffers because the referenced bundle files are absent.

Suggestions

Move the four full Solidity contracts into the referenced asset files (assets/*.sol) and replace the inline code with concise overviews plus links, so SKILL.md stays a lean overview and the Resources links resolve to real files.

Replace the generic Instructions section with a concrete deploy-and-verify workflow, e.g. 1) write tests, 2) run `forge test`, 3) deploy, 4) verify on Etherscan, with explicit validate-fix-retry checkpoints for the destructive deploy step.

Actually create the references/*.md and assets/*.sol files referenced in the Resources section, or remove the broken references, so navigation is not dead-ended.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body inlines four full Solidity contracts (~250 lines of code) and includes generic filler in Instructions ("Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs... Provide actionable steps and verification") that applies to any skill; accurate but could be tightened by moving the contracts to the referenced asset files. Not a 3 because of this padding and duplication; not a 1 because it does not explain concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Complete, executable Solidity contracts (StakingRewards, SimpleAMM, GovernanceToken/Governor, FlashLoanProvider) are copy-paste ready with real imports, modifiers, and event emission. Not a 2 because these are full implementations rather than pseudocode or partial guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no sequenced multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints; Instructions is generic and Best Practices is an unordered bullet list ("Test Thoroughly", "Audit Before Launch") with no deploy/validate/feedback sequence. Capped at 2 per the destructive-operations note since smart-contract deployment lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry loop; not a 1 because Best Practices and Common Patterns provide some structure.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A Resources section clearly signals reference and asset files with descriptions, but the referenced bundle files (references/*.md, assets/*.sol) do not exist, and the full contract content that those assets should hold is instead inlined as a monolithic wall of code. Not a 3 because files are missing and content is not appropriately split; not a 1 because sectioning and signaled references are present rather than deeply nested or absent.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-formed description that clearly states the capability, enumerates concrete protocol types, and provides an explicit "Use when" trigger clause with natural keywords. It satisfies all four dimensions without padding or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for staking, AMMs, governance, and lending systems" names the domain and enumerates four concrete protocol types, matching the anchor that lists multiple specific concrete capabilities; it is not a 2 because it goes beyond naming a domain plus a single action to enumerate several distinct deliverables.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly states what ("Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for staking, AMMs, governance, and lending systems") and when ("Use when building decentralized finance applications or smart contract protocols"), satisfying both halves with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "DeFi protocols", "staking", "AMMs", "governance", "lending", "decentralized finance applications", and "smart contract protocols" are natural phrases a user would say when requesting this work, giving good coverage rather than just one relevant keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The DeFi/smart-contract niche with specific triggers ("decentralized finance applications", "smart contract protocols") is clearly distinct from other skills and unlikely to fire for unrelated tasks.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 9 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.