CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

full-stack-orchestration-full-stack-feature

Use when working with full stack orchestration full stack feature

43

Quality

43%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/full-stack-orchestration-full-stack-feature/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable 12-phase orchestration playbook with concrete Task prompts, expected outputs, and coordination notes, though it carries some padded rationale and lacks explicit per-phase validation feedback loops for its destructive/batch steps.

Suggestions

Remove the bracketed 'Extended thinking' rationale paragraph and the generic top 'Instructions' bullets to tighten the token budget.

Add explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., 'verify API contracts pass before Phase 3', 'security audit must pass before deployment') with retry/fix loops.

Collapse the per-step Context lines where they only restate prior outputs to reduce repetition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient structured prompts, but the bracketed 'Extended thinking' paragraph and the generic 'Instructions' bullets ("Apply relevant best practices...", "Provide actionable steps and verification") add unnecessary rationale and filler, fitting 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Each phase supplies a concrete subagent_type and a copy-paste-ready Task prompt with expected output and context, matching 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; not 5 because stack choices remain generic placeholders ("or golang-pro") and outputs are described rather than concrete.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced across four phases with noted dependencies, but per-phase validation checkpoints and feedback loops are absent; because the workflow spans destructive/batch operations (migrations, deployment, security), the missing-validation cap holds it at 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all content is inline, but it is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Use when, Phases, Configuration, Success Criteria, Coordination Notes) with no nested references, fitting 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

25%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a vague trigger-only sentence with no statement of capability and no concrete actions, relying on a redundant generic phrase. It tells Claude when but not what, and is not distinctive from other full-stack skills.

Suggestions

Add a concrete 'what' clause listing specific actions (e.g., 'orchestrates backend, frontend, and infrastructure agents to deliver a full-stack feature from schema through deployment').

Replace the redundant 'full stack orchestration full stack feature' phrasing with natural trigger terms and synonyms a user would actually say.

Sharpen distinctiveness by naming the multi-agent, API-first, end-to-end workflow so it does not collide with generic full-stack skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description only names the domain ("full stack orchestration full stack feature") and lists no concrete actions, matching the 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' anchor; it does not reach 3 because no specific capability verbs are given.

2 / 5

Completeness

It provides only a 'when' clause (Use when working with...) and no 'what does this do' statement, matching 'only when is present without what'; not 3 because the what is entirely absent.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The phrase "full stack orchestration full stack feature" is a single generic keyword cluster, oddly repeated, with no synonyms or natural variations a user would actually say, fitting 'one or two generic keywords; missing the natural phrases users say'.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Full stack orchestration full stack feature" is broad and redundant, overlapping heavily with many general full-stack skills; fits 'very broad; high overlap risk with many similar skills' rather than the more distinct anchor at 3.

2 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.