hr-pro

Professional, ethical HR partner for hiring, onboarding/offboarding, PTO and leave, performance, compliant policies, and employee relations. Ask for jurisdiction and company context before advising; produce structured, bias-mitigated, lawful templates.

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/hr-pro/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable HR advisory skill with concrete playbooks and a clear deliverable workflow. Its main weakness is conciseness: generic templated boilerplate at the top and repeated legal-disclaimer language across three sections could be consolidated.

Suggestions

Remove the generic "Use this skill when / Do not use this skill when / Instructions" boilerplate — these restate the obvious and duplicate the frontmatter description.

Consolidate the not-legal-advice / consult-counsel language (currently in the disclaimer, Operating Principles #1 and #6, and Guardrails) into a single concise guardrails block.

Provide one fully worked copy-paste example artifact (e.g., a completed interview scorecard or PTO policy snippet) to push actionability from 4 toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The core playbooks and deliverable format are efficient and HR-specific, but the opening "Use this skill when / Do not use this skill when / Instructions" boilerplate (e.g., "Working on hr pro tasks or workflows") is generic filler, and the not-legal-advice caveat is restated across the disclaimer, Operating Principles #1/#6, and Guardrails.	3 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, specific guidance throughout — "8–12 job-related questions", "Rubric with 1–5 anchors per competency", a 6-part Markdown deliverable package, and placeholders like {{CompanyName}}/{{Jurisdiction}}; minor gaps in that no fully worked copy-paste template example is provided.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clear sequence from information collection ("ask up to 3 targeted questions max") through a numbered 6-part deliverable package, with guardrail checkpoints ("ask before proceeding", escalate to counsel); minor validation gaps as there is no explicit verify/retry loop.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Single ~99-line file with well-organized, clearly headed sections (Scope, Operating Principles, Playbooks, Deliverable Format) and easy navigation; no bundle files are present and none are clearly needed, though at this length a couple of playbook details could be split out.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and carves a clear HR niche with good natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit "Use when…" activation guidance, which caps completeness at 3. Adding explicit trigger phrasing and a few synonyms would lift the score meaningfully.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when…" clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., "Use when the user asks about hiring, onboarding, PTO/leave policies, performance reviews, or employee relations").

Broaden trigger coverage with common synonyms users say: recruitment, termination, benefits, payroll, and performance improvement plans.

Lead with a one-line activation trigger before the capability list so the "when" is as explicit as the "what".

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete capability domains ("hiring, onboarding/offboarding, PTO and leave, performance, compliant policies, and employee relations") plus specific behaviors ("Ask for jurisdiction and company context before advising", "produce structured, bias-mitigated, lawful templates"); minor gaps versus fully comprehensive action coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly answers "what" (HR partner for listed domains producing templates) but provides no explicit "Use when…" trigger clause, so "when" is only weakly implied — capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good natural-term coverage an HR-seeking user would say (hiring, onboarding, offboarding, PTO, leave, performance, employee relations), but missing common synonyms such as recruitment, termination, benefits, and payroll.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Carves a clear HR niche with distinct triggers; minor overlap risk with a legal/compliance skill on "compliant policies" and policy-drafting matters.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/hr-pro/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.