seo-content-planner

Creates comprehensive content outlines and topic clusters for SEO. Plans content calendars and identifies topic gaps. Use PROACTIVELY for content strategy and planning.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/seo-content-planner/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and token-efficient for a self-contained planning skill, but its guidance is more templated than executable and its workflow lacks verification checkpoints. Strengthening the concrete methods behind the planning steps would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

For each Approach step, give a concrete method or example (e.g. how to identify content gaps — competitor comparison, keyword gap tooling, 'People Also Ask' mining) instead of leaving 'Map search intent variations' abstract.

Add a lightweight validation checkpoint to the workflow, e.g. 'Before delivering: confirm each subtopic maps to a distinct search intent and that the pillar internally links to every supporting article.'

Replace placeholder-heavy outline output with one fully worked example (a real topic filled in) so the template is unambiguous to apply.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean list-based guidance with no teaching of concepts Claude already knows; minor trimmable padding like 'You are an SEO content strategist...' and the closing 'Focus on comprehensive coverage...Plan for topical authority' keep it just below the lean-and-efficient 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete structure — an outline template, cluster-component list, calendar fields, and deliverables — but leans on placeholders ('[Main Topic]', '[etc.]') and gives no actual method for the hard steps (keyword research, search-intent mapping, gap identification), leaving key execution details missing.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A 7-step Approach sequence exists and the skill is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply, but the steps are high-level ('Analyze main topic comprehensively', 'Map search intent variations') with no checkpoints or feedback loops for verifying plan quality.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Self-contained single-purpose skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Use when, Instructions, Focus Areas, Planning Framework, Approach, Output) that need no external references; at roughly 60 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-lines heuristic that would otherwise allow a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and balanced, stating both capabilities and a proactive trigger, with solid keyword coverage. It is held to 4 across the board by slightly generic trigger phrasing and minor synonym/coverage gaps rather than any structural weakness.

Suggestions

Replace 'Use PROACTIVELY for content strategy and planning' with concrete triggering scenarios, e.g. 'Use when planning blog content, building topic clusters, scheduling an editorial calendar, or finding keyword gaps'.

Add natural synonyms users say — 'keyword research', 'editorial calendar', 'blog content plan' — to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Make actions more concrete (e.g. 'maps keywords to search intent', 'builds pillar-and-cluster link maps') instead of abstract phrases like 'comprehensive content outlines'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions — 'Creates comprehensive content outlines and topic clusters', 'Plans content calendars', 'identifies topic gaps' — fitting the several-specific-actions anchor; not a 5 because the actions stay somewhat abstract ('comprehensive content outlines') without enumerating fuller coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly answers both what (outlines, topic clusters, calendars, gap identification) and when ('Use PROACTIVELY for content strategy and planning'), but the trigger guidance is somewhat generic rather than naming concrete triggering scenarios, so it does not reach the explicit-trigger-phrase bar of 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good natural-keyword coverage with 'SEO', 'content outlines', 'topic clusters', 'content calendars', 'topic gaps', 'content strategy and planning' — phrases a user would plausibly say; falls short of 5 because common synonyms like 'blog planning', 'keyword research', or 'editorial calendar' are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	SEO content planning is a reasonably distinct niche signaled by 'topic clusters', 'content calendars', and 'SEO'; minor overlap risk remains with general writing or marketing-strategy skills, placing it at 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/seo-content-planner/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 27 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.