CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

macos-signing-entitlements

Inspect macOS signing, entitlements, and Gatekeeper issues. Use when diagnosing code signing, sandbox, hardened runtime, or trust failures.

73

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is signing-entitlements in openai/plugins

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean diagnostic skill with executable commands and clear sequencing. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint in the workflow, though the skill's diagnostic nature softens that.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation step to the workflow (e.g., re-run `codesign -dvvv` / `spctl -a -vv` after applying a fix to confirm the failure class is resolved) to create a clear feedback loop and lift workflow_clarity to 5.

In step 4, pair each failure class with one concrete repair/validation command rather than only naming the class, so the minimum-fix path is fully copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: it gives concrete commands and a tight workflow without explaining what codesigning or Gatekeeper is, assuming Claude's competence; every section earns its place. The only mild redundancy is the Quick Start trigger restating the description, but it does not pad meaningfully.

5 / 5

Actionability

Executable, copy-paste-ready commands are provided (codesign -dvvv --entitlements :-, spctl -a -vv, plutil -p, security find-identity) and the workflow points at the specific tools for each failure class, covering the common diagnostic cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The four-step sequence (inspect, read signing details, classify, explain fix) is clear and ordered with a Guardrails section, but there is no explicit validate-then-retry feedback checkpoint; this is a diagnostic rather than destructive flow so the 3-cap does not apply, placing it at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Quick Start, Workflow, Useful Commands, Guardrails, Output Expectations), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, concise description that clearly states both the capability and concrete trigger conditions in third person. Minor room to add a few more synonyms (notarization, .app bundles) for fuller trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Inspect macOS signing, entitlements, and Gatekeeper issues" names the domain and several specific inspection targets (signing, entitlements, Gatekeeper), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not 5 because 'inspect' is a single verb and coverage of fix/repair actions is absent.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Inspect macOS signing, entitlements, and Gatekeeper issues") and when ("Use when diagnosing code signing, sandbox, hardened runtime, or trust failures") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when diagnosing code signing, sandbox, hardened runtime, or trust failures" provides good natural keyword coverage a user would say; not 5 because synonyms like notarization, provisioning, or .app bundles are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The macOS signing/entitlements/Gatekeeper niche with specific triggers (sandbox, hardened runtime, trust failures) is clearly distinct from other skills with minimal conflict risk, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
robinebers/openusage
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.