Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured procedural skill with executable validation and verification loops and lean, domain-specific prose. It lacks separate reference files, but the single-purpose workflow does not demand them; only minor conciseness and organization tightening is possible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and domain-specific (Cursor-native models, alias ordering, two-hop publishing) with little generic concept explanation; a few prose passages like the intro and 'Only the supplement needs manual care' could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: an inline python validation block, 'swift test --filter ...', 'gh run list', 'curl ... | python3', and 'gh workflow run deploy-pages.yml --ref main' with exact paths. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with an explicit Validate checkpoint (step 4) and a Verify-publication feedback loop (step 6: if stale after ~10 min, check and re-run deploy) covering this batch/PR operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into intro, Steps, Optional, and Rules sections with contextual references to real repo docs (docs/pricing.md, workflow files); no bundle files exist, so structure is self-contained and appropriately placed with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |