Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and build validation checkpoint; its main weakness is mild cross-section repetition of the file-splitting guidance that lightly inflates conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the file-split destinations stated in guideline 2b, the Refactor Checklist, and Common Smells into one authoritative location and cross-reference it to reduce repetition.
Tighten the Workflow and Refactor Checklist so steps map one-to-one instead of restating overlapping guidance, keeping only distinct procedural vs. checklist framing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Per-line writing is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the same guidance recurs across sections — e.g., file-split destinations appear in guideline 2b, the Refactor Checklist ('Move Process, URLSession... into Services/'), and the Common Smells — which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly concrete instruction-only guidance with specific file paths (App/<AppName>App.swift, Views/SidebarView.swift, Models/*.swift, Services/*.swift), an explicit property-ordering convention, and clear do/don't directives; absence of code is appropriate for this instruction skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 7-step Workflow plus a Refactor Checklist provide a clear sequence, and 'Build after each major split so compile errors stay local' acts as an explicit validation checkpoint with error-recovery intent. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is cohesive; sections are well-organized with no nested references, and the only cross-links (swiftui-patterns, appkit-interop) are skill-to-skill routing rather than bundle depths. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |