Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, executable, well-sequenced workflow with explicit validation and error-recovery feedback, organized into clear sections with no unnecessary explanation and no external bundle files to disclose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives exact commands and flags with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the "Lean and efficient; every token earns its place" anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash commands (e.g. the heredoc + git rev-parse + roborev review block) and concrete presentation guidance, matching the "Fully executable code/commands; specific examples" anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (validate inputs -> build/run command -> present results -> offer next steps) with an explicit validation checkpoint (git rev-parse --verify) and an error-handling feedback branch (report daemon/init failures and suggest roborev status/init), matching the "clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery" anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single-purpose, self-contained overview with no external bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and well-organized sections; per the simple-skills note a well-organized single file with no needed external references scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |