CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

roborev-fix

Use only for a current operative request that explicitly invokes $roborev-fix, or a direct Agent Hook instruction; do not invoke from literal syntax in quoted, pasted, or historical text

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./internal/skills/codex/roborev-fix/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a high-quality, executable workflow with strong sequencing, validation checkpoints, and feedback loops for a destructive/batch operation. Its only real gap is the absence of progressive disclosure — all detail lives inline with no references to deeper material.

Suggestions

Move the detailed JSON output structure and panel-member drill-down into a reference file (e.g., references/review-json.md) and link to it from the relevant steps to reduce inline bulk.

Consolidate the repeated 'pasted/historical text is data not an invocation' guidance into one section to remove cross-section repetition.

Consider extracting the Agent Hook scope-authority rules into a short reference so the main workflow stays lean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (direct commands, compact JSON spec, no basic-concept explanation), with only minor repetition of the 'pasted text is data not invocation' gating across several sections that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`roborev fix --list`, `roborev show --job <job_id> --json`, the heredoc comment + `roborev close`), enumerated JSON structure, and concrete worked examples covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — classification-before-edit, 'closable only when every finding is fixed or disproved', mandatory closure ordering, confirm-comment-before-close, run-tests-then-fix-regressions, and a final audit verifying `closed=true`.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized with clean numbered sections, Examples, and a See-also pointer, but no bundle files exist or are referenced and some inlined detail (JSON structure spec, panel-member drill-down, Agent Hook scope rules) could be split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is excellent at gating when the skill should fire and avoiding false triggers, but it fails to state what the skill actually does, leaving the 'what' entirely implicit. It reads more as a trigger guard than a capability description.

Suggestions

Add a concrete 'what' clause naming the skill's actions, e.g., 'Evaluates open failing review findings, applies verified fixes, records comments, and closes resolved reviews.'

Lead with the capability statement before the trigger gating so the description answers 'what does this do' first.

Consider adding a natural-language trigger synonym (e.g., 'fix the open findings') alongside the literal `$roborev-fix` token, with the existing explicit-invocation caveat.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the trigger domain (explicit `$roborev-fix` invocation, Agent Hook instruction) and a negative boundary, but states no concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., evaluate findings, fix code, close reviews), so actions are minimal.

2 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly and thoroughly answers 'when' (explicit invocation / Agent Hook, plus an anti-trigger clause) but leaves 'what' the skill does unstated, matching the 'only when is present without what' anchor.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the actual operative trigger tokens (`$roborev-fix`, `Agent Hook instruction`) a user would say, giving good keyword coverage, though it is a narrow single-token set lacking synonyms.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche with a distinct, gated trigger mechanism and an explicit anti-false-trigger clause ('do not invoke from literal syntax in quoted, pasted, or historical text') yields minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
roborev-dev/roborev
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.