Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable workflow skill with clear sequencing and validation checkpoints. It loses points on conciseness (some redundancy) and progressive disclosure (a long monolithic file with everything inline).
Suggestions
Collapse the three 'Skip any reviews where...' bullets into a single consolidated skip rule to remove redundancy.
Move the lengthy worked Examples and the panel-member edge-case detail into a separate reference file referenced from the body, leaving the core workflow leaner.
State the commit-ordering policy once in the main step rather than re-explaining it inside each example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and earned for genuine complexity (closure ordering, panel parents, heredoc safety), but redundancy remains — three separate 'Skip any reviews where...' bullets and repeated commit-ordering notes across the examples. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (roborev show/fix/comment/close, go test, git show) and a complete, copy-paste heredoc comment template with an explicit safety warning about shell metacharacters. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (run tests, 'Only if the comment above succeeded', audit closed=true) and feedback loops for the batch/destructive close-and-commit operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections, but it is a monolithic ~180-line single file with no reference structure; detailed examples and panel edge-case guidance sit inline rather than in split-out reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |