Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with strong validation checkpoints and copy-paste examples. Its main weakness is redundancy in the invocation-gating sections and a long monolithic structure that could be split into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly procedural and free of basic-concept padding, but the invocation-gating message recurs across "Explicit invocation only", "When NOT to invoke this skill", and "Scope authority", which could be consolidated; this matches the anchor for mostly efficient content with some unnecessary explanation that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands (roborev show/fix --list/comment/close), a concrete heredoc comment template, and a documented JSON output structure with worked examples covering pasted-findings, auto-discovery, explicit IDs, and Agent Hook cases, matching fully executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence includes explicit validation checkpoints (prove each finding before editing, run focused then required tests, mandatory comment-then-close ordering, final audit verifying closed=true), with feedback loops for error recovery on a destructive/batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-organized section headers and clear navigation; it is a long monolithic document where the JSON-structure detail and examples could plausibly live in separate references, matching good structure with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |