Add a comment to a roborev code review and close it
53
58%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./internal/skills/claude/roborev-respond/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is brief and identifies a specific tool ('roborev') and two actions (adding a comment and closing a review), which provides some distinctiveness. However, it lacks a 'Use when...' clause, doesn't cover variations of user language, and is too terse to fully guide skill selection among many options.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to respond to, comment on, or close a roborev code review.'
Include natural trigger term variations such as 'PR review', 'finish review', 'approve review', 'reject review', 'respond to review feedback'.
Expand the 'what' portion to cover additional capabilities or clarify scope, e.g., 'Adds inline or general comments to a roborev code review and marks it as closed/resolved.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names two specific actions ('add a comment' and 'close') within a specific domain ('roborev code review'), but doesn't elaborate on variations or additional capabilities. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what the skill does (add comment and close a roborev code review) but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also fairly minimal, placing this at 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'comment', 'code review', 'close', and the product-specific term 'roborev', but misses common variations users might say such as 'approve', 'reject', 'respond to review', 'finish review', or 'PR review'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The term 'roborev' is fairly distinctive and product-specific, reducing conflict risk, but 'code review' and 'comment' are generic enough to potentially overlap with other code review or commenting skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill for a simple two-command workflow. The examples are concrete and cover both primary usage paths. Minor verbosity in the IMPORTANT section and meta-instructions slightly reduce token efficiency, but overall the skill is clear and effective.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but has some unnecessary padding. The 'IMPORTANT' section explaining that bash commands must be executed is somewhat redundant for Claude, and the meta-instruction paragraph about guidelines vs rigid script adds tokens without much value for this simple skill. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands with proper syntax, covers edge cases like quote escaping, and includes concrete examples with exact command invocations. The examples show both the with-message and without-message flows with copy-paste ready commands. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence (validate → execute → verify) with explicit error handling and common failure causes listed. For this simple two-command operation, the validation and verification steps are appropriate checkpoints, and the feedback on common errors provides adequate recovery guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with clear sections (usage, instructions, examples, see also). The cross-reference to /roborev-fix is appropriate and one level deep. No need for external files given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
3172d3b
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.