Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction-only skill with concrete tool calls, a clear sequenced workflow, and a genuinely useful anti-pattern. Minor trimming of the redundant WRONG/RIGHT block and an explicit feedback checkpoint would push it higher.
Suggestions
Collapse the Anti-patterns WRONG/RIGHT pair into a single concise boundary rule to remove the slight redundancy with the Why section.
Add an explicit verify step in the Workflow (e.g., confirm the recalled session's cwd matched before reporting) to create a light feedback loop.
Consider moving the See also and Troubleshooting lines into the reference file or a short footer to keep the core body under 50 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that does not explain concepts Claude already knows; the Why and Anti-patterns sections earn their tokens by conveying a non-obvious matching pitfall, though the WRONG/RIGHT restatement is slightly redundant. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete tool calls (memory_sessions, memory_recall with literal args), executable matching logic (path.resolve, startsWith(projectPath + sep)), an expected-output exemplar, and concrete WRONG/RIGHT patterns. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step numbered workflow with a closing Checklist serving as verification, but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop; this is not a destructive/batch operation so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Quick start, Why, Workflow, Anti-patterns, Checklist, See also, Troubleshooting) with a single one-level-deep reference to ../_shared/TROUBLESHOOTING.md; body is slightly above the simple-skill 50-line threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |