Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body: concrete tool call and output example, clear presentation workflow, and anti-pattern/checklist guardrails against the key risk of inventing session data. The only minor gap is that validation guidance sits in a separate checklist rather than inline in the workflow steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Quick start, Why, Anti-patterns, Checklist) earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete copy-paste tool call (`memory_sessions { "limit": 20 }`) with an exact expected-output format, plus a precise presentation spec (first 8 chars of id, project, start time, status), fully covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence is present and a Checklist provides verification, but validation lives in a separate section rather than as an explicit inline checkpoint in the workflow, fitting the 'clear sequence, minor validation gaps' anchor rather than the 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (under 50 lines), single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and only one clearly-signaled one-level reference (`../_shared/TROUBLESHOOTING.md`), matching the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |