Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with complete, executable quiz mechanics and clean progressive disclosure of the answer key. Workflow clarity is strong but could add a recovery path for malformed replies.
Suggestions
Add a brief step for handling invalid or blank learner input (e.g., re-prompt with the neutral reply format) to complete the feedback loop.
Tighten the personalized-learning-path section by consolidating the table rules into a concise checklist to reduce token weight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and presents questions compactly, though the repeated per-round structure and the verbose learning-path specification rules could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact questions, lettered options, precise scoring rules, an explicit score-to-entry-point table, and a literal output table template with a verbatim reply prompt. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear round-by-round sequence with explicit answer-isolation gating ('Do not read that reference before the learner submits both answers'), but lacks an explicit recovery step for invalid or blank learner input. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md serves as the overview with the answer key correctly split into references/answer-key.md (a real, confirmed file), one level deep, well-signaled, with instruction to read only the current round's key. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |