Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and points cleanly to real one-level-deep bundle files with a clear sequenced workflow and an activation checkpoint. Its only gap is placeholder command arguments and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (numbered steps, two guard rules, a return statement) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete executable command ('python3 scripts/build_catalog.py project=PATH user=PATH') and names specific files/arrays, but uses PATH placeholders and delegates detail to references, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit checkpoint (step 4: 'Inspect the JSON collisions and omitted arrays before activating a skill'); no full validate-fix-retry loop, so it stops just short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short overview body with three clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (references/discovery-contract.md, assets/scope-policy.json, scripts/build_catalog.py), all verified to exist as real files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |