CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aws-cloud-patterns

AWS cloud patterns for Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, and Infrastructure as Code with CDK/Terraform

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/aws-cloud-patterns/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, actionable, and well-organized with executable code and a useful checklist, but it lacks an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and almost entirely executable code plus one-line design heuristics, with no padded explanation of AWS concepts or how SDKs work; it assumes Claude's competence.

3 / 3

Actionability

Code blocks use real SDK imports and CDK constructs with complete, copy-paste-ready params, and the design notes give specific applicable guidance (e.g. ARM64 for cost, GSIs for alternate queries).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Content is organized into discrete patterns with an anti-patterns list and a checklist, but there is no explicit multi-step sequence with validation checkpoints or feedback loops, leaving checkpoints implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the body makes no file references; the single SKILL.md is well-organized under clear headers, which satisfies progressive disclosure for a skill with no need for external references.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

72%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and well-targeted to AWS with strong natural trigger terms, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and describes domains rather than concrete actions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when building or reviewing AWS serverless, container, storage, or IaC workloads with Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, CDK, or Terraform.'

Shift from enumerating areas to naming concrete actions, e.g. 'Implements, reviews, and troubleshoots AWS patterns for...' to better signal what the skill does.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a concrete AWS domain and enumerates specific services (Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB) and IaC tools (CDK/Terraform), but describes areas rather than concrete actions, so it falls short of the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It answers 'what' (AWS cloud patterns for a list of services) but has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 2 per the judging guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural service and tool names a user would actually say (Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, CDK, Terraform) give good coverage of likely trigger terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The AWS-specific service enumeration carves a clear niche with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.