Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable reference with concrete commands, thresholds, and tables throughout, and no padding. The main improvement opportunities are consolidating the duplicated subagent guidance and adding a verification/re-check step to the degraded-context recovery flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — tables for strategies and budgets, code blocks for config, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable filler remains ('The main session stays clean while subagents handle the volume') and subagent delegation appears in both the strategy table and its own section, keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact commands (/context, /compact, /mcp, /resume), a copy-paste settings JSON block, numeric thresholds (>70%, >90%, <10 MCPs, <80 tools), and tool-call budgets (20–80). Coverage spans diagnosis, immediate action, configuration, and recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Quick Diagnosis' is a numbered sequence with explicit percentage checkpoints, and 'When Context Is Degraded' gives an ordered escalation (compact → new session → config changes). Not 5 because the middle sections are parallel strategy lists rather than a sequenced workflow, and the degraded-context recovery has no re-check step to confirm the fix worked. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~110-line body is organized into clearly labeled sections with a diagnostic entry point up top. Everything is appropriately inlined for a skill this size; minor gaps (behavioral token-efficiency rules could live in a reference file if the skill grows) keep it below a clear-overview-with-signaled-references score of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |