CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

smart-commit

Run quality gates, review staged changes for issues, and create a well-crafted conventional commit. Use when saying "commit", "git commit", "save my changes", or ready to commit after making changes.

100

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Smart Commit

Trigger

Use when saying "commit", "save changes", or ready to commit after making changes.

Workflow

  1. Check current state and identify what to commit.
  2. Run quality gates (lint, typecheck, tests on affected files).
  3. Scan staged changes for issues.
  4. Draft a conventional commit message from the diff.
  5. Stage specific files, create the commit.
  6. Prompt for learnings from this change.

Commands

git status
git diff --stat

npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -5
npm run typecheck 2>&1 | tail -5
npm test -- --changed --passWithNoTests 2>&1 | tail -10

git add <specific files>
git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <summary>"

Code Review Scan

Before committing, check staged changes in production code (not test files) for:

  • console.log / debugger statements (suppressed in test files — see Review Suppressions)
  • TODO/FIXME/HACK comments without ticket references (e.g., TODO(JIRA-123) is fine)
  • Hardcoded secrets or API keys
  • Leftover test-only code

Flag any issues before proceeding.

Commit Message Format

<type>(<scope>): <short summary>

<body - what changed and why>

Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, perf, ci, style

Guardrails

  • Never skip quality gates unless user explicitly says to.
  • Stage specific files by name. Never git add -A or git add ..
  • Summary under 72 characters. Body explains why, not what.
  • No generic messages ("fix bug", "update code").
  • Reference issue numbers when applicable.

Output

  • Quality gate results (pass/fail)
  • Issues found in staged changes
  • Suggested commit message
  • Commit hash after committing
  • Prompt: any learnings to capture?

Review Suppressions

Do NOT flag these during the pre-commit scan. They add noise without catching real bugs:

  • Threshold, config value, or feature flag changes (limits, timeouts, retry counts)
  • Import reordering that does not change runtime behavior
  • Whitespace-only or formatting-only changes
  • Adding or removing console.log in test files
  • TODO/FIXME comments (tracked separately in issue trackers)
  • Variable or parameter renames that do not change behavior
Repository
rohitg00/pro-workflow
Commit

1de1554

Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.

Claim skill