Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that clearly defines a collaborative design process with good workflow sequencing and validation checkpoints. The main weakness is the lack of concrete examples - showing a sample question sequence, example design section, or template would make it more immediately actionable. The principles section effectively reinforces key behaviors.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 example questions demonstrating the 'one question at a time' and 'multiple choice preferred' principles
Include a brief example of what a 200-300 word design section looks like in practice
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose and the bullet points are tight and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides clear process guidance and principles, but lacks concrete examples of questions to ask, sample design section outputs, or specific file templates. The guidance is directional rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced from understanding through exploration to design presentation and documentation. Includes explicit validation checkpoints ('ask after each section whether it looks right') and feedback loops ('go back and clarify'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections and appropriate references to other skills (elements-of-style, superpowers:using-git-worktrees, superpowers:writing-plans). Content is appropriately scoped for a SKILL.md overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |