Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean instruction skill with a clear RED-GREEN workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, concrete file and command pointers, and a genuine single-level reference. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids concept padding, with only minor actionability and disclosure gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient throughout: it assumes Claude's competence, gives concrete pointers (registry.go, shared.ContextWithTimeout, make gate commands) without explaining basic CLI or Go concepts, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance with specific files, flags, exit codes, and a runnable gate block ('make format', 'make lint', 'ASC_BYPASS_KEYCHAIN=1 make test'), with only minor gaps such as the live smoke test lacking a concrete command template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced RED-GREEN-verify-handoff flow with explicit validation checkpoints ('Stop and align before coding', 'record the expected failure', 'Rerun the focused failing test after each small fix', the repository gate), matching the top anchor for sequenced validation with feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with sections split by phase and a single well-signaled one-level reference (test-matrix.md) that is a real file in ./references; only minor gaps in that some API-validation detail could itself be referenced out, but placement is appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |