Conciseness

Quotes: "status reads once; watch repeats until a terminal state; fix-and-watch also applies authorized fixes" and "Re-fetch the PR after pushing and confirm the live head, checks, and thread state" — the body is lean and dense; every sentence carries an instruction, no concept Claude already knows is explained, and there is no padding. It matches the 5 anchor ('every token earns its place'); the 4 anchor's 'minor instances of over-explanation' does not apply.

Actionability

Quotes: "Resolve the exact PR and compare its current head SHA with the last audited or pushed SHA", "Fetch checks, reviews, top-level comments, and GraphQL review threads in parallel", and the checkpoint field list ("objective, PR, head and base SHAs, authority, validation results and inputs...") — the decision guidance is concrete and specific, with exact states and required checkpoint fields. Not a 5 because no literal commands or code (e.g., gh CLI invocations) are given and key execution details are deferred to AGENTS.md and $audit-asc-pr, leaving minor gaps; it is well above the 3 anchor's pseudocode-level vagueness.

Workflow Clarity

Quotes: the numbered recheck sequence ("1. Resolve the exact PR... 2. Fetch checks... 5. If `main` advanced, refresh the merge-base diff"), explicit validation checkpoints ("Re-fetch the PR after pushing and confirm the live head, checks, and thread state", "Reproduce a valid defect and add or update a focused test before changing behavior"), and error-recovery loops ("After an uncertain write, reconcile remote state before a bounded retry"). The feedback loops and terminal-state definitions (observed/changed/pending/clean/blocked) fully match the 5 anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Quotes: sections "## Recheck current state", "## Address actionable feedback", "## Return one state", "## Automation contract" — the single-file body is well organized with no bundle files to split, and the simple-skill note would allow a 5. It scores 4 instead because critical rules are repeatedly deferred to an external `AGENTS.md` ("follow the branch-update rules in `AGENTS.md`") and a `$audit-asc-pr` skill that are not part of the bundle, so navigation depends on files whose existence and depth cannot be verified here.

Specificity

Quotes: "Recheck an in-progress App-Store-Connect-CLI pull request for new review feedback, CI results, head changes, and merge readiness" — it names the domain and lists several concrete recheck actions (review feedback, CI results, head changes, merge readiness). It falls just short of the 5 anchor's comprehensive coverage since adjacent capabilities (replying to review threads, merging) are only implied, and it is clearly above the 3 anchor's "1-2 concrete actions".

Completeness

Quotes: "Recheck an in-progress App-Store-Connect-CLI pull request for new review feedback, CI results, head changes, and merge readiness. Use when the user says to check for new PR comments..." — it explicitly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5 anchor's pattern exactly. Third-person voice is used, consistent with the guidelines.

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes: "Use when the user says to check for new PR comments, continue polling, fix and loop, babysit a PR, or keep working until the PR is clean" — these are natural phrases a user would actually say. Not a 5 because common synonyms like "watch a PR" or "keep an eye on the PR" are absent, though "babysit a PR" covers the intent; well above the 3 anchor's generic single keyword.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Quotes: "App-Store-Connect-CLI pull request" — the niche is clearly scoped to a specific CLI's PRs with distinct triggers like "babysit a PR" and "fix and loop". Not a 5 because generic trigger phrases such as "check for new PR comments" could also match a general PR-review or CI-watching skill, creating minor overlap risk.