Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly sequenced, validation-heavy archival workflow with concrete CLI commands, explicit stop-on-failure feedback loops, and an exit-condition checklist. Minor conciseness redundancy and a judgment-dependent pathspec placeholder keep it just short of top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural prose that assumes Claude's competence (no basic git/archiving explanations), with minor redundancy such as the delta-merge semantics restated in Step 2 and the archive directory move repeated near the exit conditions. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands throughout (comet state transition, comet archive, git add/commit with explicit pathspecs); the only gap is the placeholder '<逐项核对后的归档路径...>' which requires judgment rather than being copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps (0, 0b, 1–5) with explicit validation checkpoints (entry check, transition success required, archive guard, staged-diff review), feedback loops for error recovery (stop on non-zero exit, retry the same push only), and a full exit-conditions checklist for this destructive/batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to comet-classic/reference/*.md (decision-point, context-recovery, scripts, classic-layout); no own bundle files exist, and some inline procedural detail could live in reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |