Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, highly actionable archive workflow with strong validation checkpoints, an explicit exit-conditions checklist, and well-signaled one-level-deep reference navigation. Its main weakness is conciseness — repeated prohibitions and re-explained semantics add tokens that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated "不得..." prohibitions (e.g. branch-switching/rebinding and commit-mixing rules) into a single guard-rules block referenced once, rather than restating across multiple steps.
Remove the duplicate explanation of delta-merge semantics (Step 2 line on ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED) since the same behavior is already covered in the script-step enumeration.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly procedural and dense, but repeats many "不得" prohibitions and re-explains the delta-merge semantics in Step 2, so it could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable commands throughout (comet state select/check/transition, comet archive, git add/diff --cached/commit, comet guard, comet state clear-selection) with explicit pathspec usage, copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (entry check, BLOCKED handling, user confirmation blocking point, exit-code checks, git attribution guard), an exit-conditions checklist, and error-recovery feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It uses well-signaled one-level-deep references to comet/reference/*.md (classic-layout, scripts, decision-point, context-recovery), each tied to a specific purpose, with clearly organized numbered sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |