Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction-only skill with concrete commands and explicit validation across determine-sync-verify phases. The only soft spot is an implied rather than explicit error-recovery retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 20 lean lines with no concept padding; assumes Claude's competence and every line carries actionable guidance, including the specific 'gate'→'门' translation note. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (Prettier, git diff --check, mint validate --disable-openapi), concrete repo paths, and a specific commit-then-gitlink sequence covering the common delivery cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with explicit validation steps (Prettier, git diff --check, mint validate, contract tests) and a pause-for-confirmation checkpoint; the retry/feedback loop is only implied via 'report accurate fallback/timeout' rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized section headers and a single clearly-signaled one-level external reference (maintainer-contract.md); no bundle files to over-structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |