Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-sequenced with explicit verification steps, but its progressive-disclosure design depends on CHECKLIST.md and related-skill files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced CHECKLIST.md (and the ../command-*/SKILL.md related skills) with the bundle so the heavily-referenced one-level-deep detail actually resolves.
If CHECKLIST.md is intentionally external, note that explicitly or inline the minimal method-mapping table so the skill is self-sufficient.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific DSL semantics (flag_option, key_value_option, negatable, as_operand, etc.) that Claude would not already know, and it defers the full method table to CHECKLIST.md rather than padding with generic explanations. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, exact documentation URLs, specific DSL methods with worked mapping examples (flag_option :verbose → --verbose), a numbered workflow, and a defined output table make the guidance directly executable for an audit skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps with explicit verification (trace Ruby call → bound argument → expected git CLI, then compare against the man page) and delegation to CHECKLIST.md sections give a clear, checklisted sequence for a read-only audit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and signaling are strong (clear TOC, one-level-deep references with section anchors), but the primary referenced file CHECKLIST.md is absent from the bundle, so the promised detailed reference cannot actually be loaded. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |