Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable single-purpose workflow with concrete code and validation steps. The only weakness is an implicit rather than explicit error-recovery loop in the verification phase.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what i18n, Vue, or $t() are, and every phase delivers only actionable specifics, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: a concrete before/after data()-to-computed code block, explicit transformation rules (e.g. '<p>Text</p>' -> "{{ $t('namespace.key') }}"), and an executable verification grep, covering the common template/interpolation/data cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation (document the count, then 'must be 0' plus a grep), satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement; however the error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when the count is non-zero) is implied rather than stated, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files and no nested references, with well-organized phase headers — matching the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 on well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |