Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally lean, well-sequenced exploration workflow with a concrete command and a clearly signaled reference. Its only weak spot is the absence of explicit validation/feedback steps, though the read-only nature of the task limits that impact.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~10-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete executable command `homecore guidance --query "<capability>" --repo <checkout>` and a specific doc path, but uses placeholders and leaves minor gaps in what to do with inspected test results, fitting 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step numbered sequence is present with implicit checkpoints (confirm status, inspect tests before proposing code); it stops short of explicit validate/retry feedback loops, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and a well-organized numbered structure, the simple-skill exception applies; the single one-level external reference (`v2/docs/homecore-capabilities.md`) is clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |