Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with concrete commands per path and appropriate delegation to sibling skills; the only gap is that per-path validation feedback loops are implicit rather than spelled out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; the 'not a camera' CSI callout is non-obvious domain knowledge that earns its place, and commands are inline with no padded explanations. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each path ships copy-paste-ready commands (docker run, cargo test, cargo run -- --help) covering the common cases, matching the anchor-5 'fully executable' example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Pick-a-path → Then sequence with checkpoints present (test pass count, open-localhost verification, claim-check routing), but per-path 'verify it worked' feedback loops are mostly implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed; well-organized sections and clearly signaled one-level-deep cross-skill references (provision-node, calibrate-room, verify), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |