Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured, single-purpose skill with concrete executable commands and a useful boundary note. Its only gaps are the `<checkout>` placeholder and the lack of guidance on choosing among the four profiles.
Suggestions
Clarify the `<checkout>` parameter, e.g. note it is the repo path to verify or give an example value.
Add one line on how to choose a profile (e.g. start with core, escalate to full only when core passes), turning the description's 'smallest relevant' into actionable guidance.
Optionally show expected pass/fail output so the validation checkpoint is explicit rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: four commands and a one-sentence boundary note, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides four concrete, copy-pasteable commands covering the common cases, but the `<checkout>` placeholder is a minor gap requiring substitution rather than being fully ready to run. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (run a verify command) is unambiguous and the boundary note explains what passing validates, but the body does not guide which profile to select when multiple are relevant, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized under a clear title with a structured command list, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |