Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, action-oriented, and well-structured with executable commands and explicit validation checkpoints including a re-verify feedback loop, fully matching the rubric's strong anchors across all dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is dense and purposeful — 'feeds a reference signal through the production pipeline and hashes the output against expected_features.sha256' — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands — 'ruview_verify', 'bash scripts/generate-witness-bundle.sh', 'cd dist/witness-bundle-ADR028-*/ && bash VERIFY.sh', 'ruview_claim_check {text}' — with expected outputs, fitting the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the witness bundle generation-then-verify flow with explicit checkpoints ('Must print VERDICT: PASS', 'must be 7/7 PASS') and a regenerate-then-re-verify feedback loop, satisfying the validation-and-recovery anchor for this validation-focused skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into four clearly labeled sections (deterministic proof, witness bundle, claim honesty, firmware-specific), meeting the simple-skills allowance for full marks on well-organized structure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |