CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-automation-smart-agent

Agent skill for automation-smart-agent - invoke with $agent-automation-smart-agent

38

1.07x

Quality

3%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.07x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.agents/skills/agent-automation-smart-agent/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

98%

14%

Agent Team Composition for a Secure Payment Microservice

Capability matching and team composition

Criteria
Without context
With context

Task requirements analysis

100%

100%

Capability analysis step

50%

100%

Agent selection from capability analysis

75%

100%

Architecture/design agent present

100%

100%

Implementation agent present

100%

100%

Security review agent present

100%

100%

Testing agent present

100%

100%

Mesh or peer topology chosen

0%

80%

Decision log present

100%

100%

Reasoning documented per decision

100%

100%

Conservative scope

100%

100%

Task dependency awareness

100%

100%

Without context: $0.2467 · 1m 47s · 11 turns · 15 in / 5,023 out tokens

With context: $0.4590 · 2m 14s · 21 turns · 27 in / 6,427 out tokens

100%

7%

CI/CD Agent Pool Scaling Simulator

Workload-based scaling and resource optimization

Criteria
Without context
With context

Scale-up on high load

100%

100%

Scale-down after surge

100%

100%

Utilisation monitoring

100%

100%

Work distribution across agents

100%

100%

Agent lifecycle management

100%

100%

Scaling event log

100%

100%

Cost vs. performance trade-off

100%

100%

Just-in-time spawning rationale

80%

100%

No external dependencies

100%

100%

Predictive or burst awareness

50%

100%

Without context: $0.3956 · 2m 11s · 13 turns · 20 in / 8,454 out tokens

With context: $0.5712 · 2m 54s · 22 turns · 27 in / 9,102 out tokens

100%

Resilience Plan for a Multi-Agent Document Processing System

Failure recovery and adaptive coordination

Criteria
Without context
With context

Failure detection signals

100%

100%

Automatic reinforcement

100%

100%

Work reassignment

100%

100%

Strategy adjustment described

100%

100%

Graceful degradation mode

100%

100%

Adaptive learning from failures

100%

100%

Capability gap identification

100%

100%

Manual override mechanism

100%

100%

Override without full restart

100%

100%

Iterative improvement loop

100%

100%

Appropriate detail level

100%

100%

Without context: $0.1661 · 1m 10s · 10 turns · 17 in / 3,172 out tokens

With context: $0.3220 · 1m 42s · 19 turns · 57 in / 4,753 out tokens

Repository
ruvnet/claude-flow
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.