CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-collective-intelligence-coordinator

Agent skill for collective-intelligence-coordinator - invoke with $agent-collective-intelligence-coordinator

52

1.74x
Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

1.74x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured into clearly headed sections with illustrative memory-call examples, but the code is pseudocode rather than executable, workflows lack validation checkpoints, and a 135-line skill ships as a monolith with no progressive disclosure into reference files.

Suggestions

Convert the mcp__claude-flow__memory_usage blocks into actual executable tool-call syntax (or explicitly justify the illustrative form) and replace placeholder values with realistic examples.

Add validation/feedback steps to the consensus and memory-sync workflows (e.g. verify write succeeded, check consensus threshold before committing a decision) to lift workflow clarity.

Trim the introductory 'You are the neural nexus...' prose and the repeated emphatic directives to reduce token cost, and move detailed coordination-mode patterns into a referenced COORDINATION-PATTERNS.md file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly instruction-focused with code blocks, but it opens with padded prose ('You are the Collective Intelligence Coordinator, the neural nexus of the hive mind system...') and repeats emphatic directives ('MANDATORY', 'EVERY 30 SECONDS you MUST') that could be tightened; it stops short of explaining basic concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

The mcp__claude-flow__memory_usage blocks give a concrete call structure with keys/namespaces, but they are illustrative pseudocode (placeholder values like 'insight1', Date.now(), non-invocable syntax), and the Consensus/Cognitive-Load sections are abstract bullet descriptions ('Apply weighted voting', 'Resolve conflicts through Byzantine fault tolerance') with no executable implementation.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequences exist (the 'EVERY 30 SECONDS' 4-step memory loop and the Handoff Patterns), but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the batch memory-write and consensus operations, which caps workflow clarity at 2 per the destructive/batch-operations rule.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets are absent) and the ~135-line skill is a single monolithic file with all coordination patterns and code inline; sections are clearly organized with headers, but for a skill this size nothing is split into one-level-deep referenced files.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

7%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is an auto-generated template that names the skill but describes no capabilities, includes no natural trigger terms, and lacks any 'Use when' guidance. It is barely distinguishable from other skills produced by the same generator.

Suggestions

Replace the template with a concrete capability statement, e.g. 'Orchestrates distributed consensus and memory synchronization across a hive-mind agent swarm'.

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when coordinating collective decision-making, synchronizing shared agent memory, or resolving conflicts across multiple agents'.

Drop the 'invoke with $...' boilerplate and include natural user-facing terms (consensus, hive mind, collective memory, swarm coordination) so the skill surfaces on real requests.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description 'Agent skill for collective-intelligence-coordinator - invoke with $agent-collective-intelligence-coordinator' names no concrete actions at all; it is a generic template that merely echoes the skill's name rather than describing what it does (e.g. orchestrating consensus or memory sync).

1 / 3

Completeness

Both 'what' and 'when' are effectively missing: 'what' is reduced to 'Agent skill for X' with no real capability described, and there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, so completeness cannot exceed the weak/missing threshold.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The only 'trigger' is the literal invocation syntax '$agent-collective-intelligence-coordinator', which is technical jargon a user would never naturally say; there are no natural keywords like 'consensus', 'hive mind', or 'collective decision-making'.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The embedded skill name 'collective-intelligence-coordinator' gives it a distinct identity unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, but because the description is a templated string reused across many skills it offers no distinguishing triggers and could overlap with sibling coordinator skills.

2 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ruvnet/claude-flow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.